Elhaj, Osman

Adjudication Boards (ABs) have become an important mechanism in construction project administration, contributing to improved contractual performance and preventing the escalation of disputes during project execution. This study examines the role of Adjudication Boards as an effective alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanism in construction contracts, focusing on the legal nature and practical impact of their decisions in international construction practice. The research adopts descriptive, analytical, and comparative approaches, with particular reference to the FIDIC standard forms of contract. The findings indicate that construction disputes in the Middle East and Arab countries remain relatively limited compared to other regions due to prevailing contractual practices and dispute management methods. The study highlights the significant role of FIDIC contracts in institutionalizing Dispute Resolution Councils and establishing a regulatory framework for their operation. It concludes that Adjudication Board decisions derive their binding force from the contractual agreement between parties and recommends strengthening academic awareness and professional training in this field.